[BoulderCouncilHotline] Re: Denver Park Hill Golf Course Conservation Easement

von Keyserling, Patrick vonkeyserlingp at bouldercolorado.gov
Mon Aug 5 09:26:18 MDT 2019


Council Member Weaver,

Attached is a PDF of the article you referenced.

Patrick von Keyserling
Communication Director
[Communication_lockup_COBlogo]<https://bouldercolorado.gov/>
O: 303-441-4959
C: 303-513-4136
vonkeyserlingp at bouldercolorado.gov<mailto:vonkeyserlingp at bouldercolorado.gov>

Communication Department
1001 Arapahoe Ave. | Boulder, CO 80302
Bouldercolorado.gov<https://bouldercolorado.gov/>

From: Weaver, Sam <WeaverS at bouldercolorado.gov>
Sent: Sunday, August 4, 2019 6:08 PM
To: HOTLINE <HOTLINE at bouldercolorado.gov>
Subject: Denver Park Hill Golf Course Conservation Easement

Fellow Council Members and HOTLINE followers,

In the Daily Camera ( and Denver Post) today was an article about a conservation easement that Denver entered into in 1997 for $2M to preserve Park Hill Golf Course over the long run as urban open space.  A developer has now purchased that land, and is proposing substantial commercial development on the 155 acres.  The developer's stated hope is to convince the Denver City Council to abandon or alter the former conservation agreement to allow this commercial development.

While I am no fan of golf courses per se, I am interested in how conservation easements work in Colorado, how binding they are, and how to structure them to most effectively achieve long-term goals.  As we approach the decision on potentially referring a measure to use taxpayer funds for preserving Long's Gardens for community agriculture in many forms, I have questions about how to structure any such purchase.

I would request that the Council receive legal advice on the types and durability of potential conservation easement approaches.  From the article cited below, it is clear that there is a possibility that future Councils can unwind what may seem permanent at the agreement execution.  If ownership of a conservation easement by the departments of Open Space or Parks and Recreation could provide additional future protections (such as 2-body approval and/or referral to a referendum), I would like to understand those options.

https://www.denverpost.com/2019/08/04/denver-park-hill-golf-course-green-space/

(On-line, this article is behind a pay-wall if you have read too many free Denver Post articles.  I read the article in print, so it would be great if staff could provide either electronic or printed versions of the article for Council and the public.)

All the best,

Sam Weaver
Mayor Pro Tem
Boulder City Council
weavers at bouldercolorado.gov<mailto:weavers at bouldercolorado.gov>
Phone: 303-416-6130

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.ci.boulder.co.us/pipermail/bouldercouncilhotline/attachments/20190805/d636a6eb/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4244 bytes
Desc: image001.png
Url : http://list.ci.boulder.co.us/pipermail/bouldercouncilhotline/attachments/20190805/d636a6eb/attachment.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: denver-park-hill-golf-cou.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 1246692 bytes
Desc: denver-park-hill-golf-cou.pdf
Url : http://list.ci.boulder.co.us/pipermail/bouldercouncilhotline/attachments/20190805/d636a6eb/attachment.pdf 


More information about the bouldercouncilhotline mailing list